Noncustodial Parent -The judge TOOK AWAY custody....

In most probably 98%, or more, of the custody "decisions" made by Hamilton County Court judges, were done in error, unlawfully, and unconstitutionally. It was (legally, constitutionally) **never** about which parent would get AWARDED custody of the children (because, legally, BOTH parents *already* HAD custody)... The County court judge simply TOOK AWAY custody of only one parent or the other (i.e., committing gender discrimination, and violation of equal protection), and did it **without** the constitutionally-required "clear and convincing" evidence findings of parental unfitness... or even, in almost all custody cases in this country - without even any suggestions of parental unfitness, at all!!

Are you ready to do something about it? Join the Class Action Suit. Check your eligiblity here and sign up NOW! http://www.indianacrc.org/ncp-n-taxpayer.html

When Did You Last See Your Father? Or In Camera Interveiw In Hamilton County Court

Why would I put this picture on here? It reminded me of when my ex demanded that my children be brought into court to tell the judge that I smoke cigarettes around them.. How evil of me. Mainly she has used the kids as pawns in her campaign of hatred for me rejecting her. "If you leave me your leaving the kids too" 13 years of court battles. But I just won't quit.

The history of the painting

John Adair, in his authoritative book 'By The Sword Divided', states that the two children were those belonging to one Bulstrode Whitelocke of Fawley Court near Henley. Whitelocke was a lawyer of some note and it is not clear which side he supported but it is clear that his house was ransacked by the Royalists in the first instance and then sometime later by Parliament forces. The picture was painted in Victorian times and the scene being portrayed was played out very early in the conflict before any major battles had been fought and it was still fairly difficult to distinguish between the two sides.

It seems that Whitelocke was absent when the Royalists arrived and an assistant of the household removed the two children to his own house and that is where they were 'interviewed' by Sir Thomas Byron, a Cavalier of some rank. It is he who is depicted sitting at the table resting his chin on his hands. Although the painting portrays a somewhat threatening scene, the eye witness, Whitelocke's assistant, Cooke, stated that no harm befell the children and certainly no harm came to Whitelocke during the course of the war.